Senator Debakis,
I read with pleasure, and in the main agree with, your op-ed
in the July 5th SL Tribune. Education in Utah
is in terrible shape, and the largest single contributor to the condition is
the lack of funding. I’d like to discuss your article and share my thoughts
with you.
As you pointed out, teacher salaries in Utah
are an embarrassment to any thinking individual. Utah
colleges and universities turn out very well qualified teachers, but they
cannot afford to stay in Utah and
teach. We are losing this valuable resource to 49 other states. Our teachers
should be paid, at the least, the average salary for teachers in the United
States ; $56,069 is the national average, as
opposed to Utah ’s average of $46,571.
Our teachers, even at beginning salaries, should not be eligible for welfare.
Our class sizes are another point of discussion. Please
consider this statement:
The ration of students to teachers
must not be confused with average class size, which is the number of students
assigned to a classroom for instructional purposes. Class size and
student-teacher ratio are very different concepts and cannot be used
interchangeably. According to recent studies, the difference between
student-teacher ration and average class sizes in K-3 is 9 or 10 students.
(Sharp, 2002)
You mentioned Wyoming ’s
educational funding in your op-ed, I would like to expand upon that. One of the
(major) reasons Wyoming can put
so much more into education than Utah
is willing to afford, is the extractive tax. Wyoming
views it’s minerals as a resource owned by all the people, and therefore taxes
extraction to benefit all the citizens. Utah
can, and should, increase the mineral extraction tax; for example, coal in Wyoming
is taxed at 3.75% (underground) or 7% surface, while Utah
has no tax on coal extraction. (Source: The Council of State Governments, http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/7.15_2013.pdf,
retrieved July 6, 2015 )
This money could be used to offset the effect of returning 100%
of the state income tax to funding public education, and in fact could be used
to increase our educational funding to national averages.
I do admit, Senator, establishing this tax would be a very
hard sell, given the mind-set of most of Utah ’s
legislators.
Charter schools, in my opinion, are another drag on our
educational system. While I realize they are very popular with our legislature,
I feel (and on this subject I have only anecdotal information) charter schools
serve no educational purpose that is not met by the public system. Charter
schools can reject any student, and send them back to the public schools, but
they get to keep the funding for that student for the school year. This, in
effect, boosts the revenue per student in the charter school, while cutting the
revenue per student in the public system, thereby exasperating the public
school funding issue. Charter schools exist, in my opinion, only so “my” child
does not have to be in a classroom with “those” children. My solution is
simplistic: close the charter schools; if parents want to pay for private
school education, certainly that is their option.
To address the matter of accountability, I would propose
that the State Board of Education consist of educators, not only on the K-12
level, but also college/university educators. They should be advised by members
of the business community, who can use their knowledge to drive education to
the curriculum needed to prepare students for college, and to compete for good,
well-paying jobs. In this vein, we also need a robust trade school sector that
can offer good careers for those who do not want college, or would not be
successful in obtaining a college degree. The State Superintendent of Education
should be held personally responsible for the success or failure of the school
system.
Given the above, I would like to see the Utah
legislature commit to a 5-year plan to achieve the following goals:
1) Increase
per-pupil funding to the national average;
2) Increase
teacher pay to the national average;
3) Reduce
class sizes to the national average.
Senator Debakis, I appreciate your progressive stance on
education, and your willingness to open the much-needed discussion on our
educational system. I wish you the best
in reforming our current educational system.
Respectfully,
Robert M. Hartman
Your comments are welcome, as always.
Your comments are welcome, as always.
This is very good but a bit lengthy for a Utah Senator. You have great bullet points and I hope Jim will take the time to read the whole thing as education in Utah is sad to say the last in the nation. I am not sure if we can raise enough money to pay off our legislatures like private education and charter schools do, but it might be to expensive to "pay to play" game for Utah families. My two kids are out of school now but in the 4 years between the two from about 1986 to 1990 was changed dramatically in class sizes and my youngest one paid the price for needing more help but with 33 others in his class it was not possible.
ReplyDelete