I owe an apology to my long-time readers for not creating this article earlier; it has been brewing (fermenting?) for some time. I will not apologize, however, if I upset your particular apple cart with this subject.
Education, theoretically universally available to all American children, has long been valued as an integral part of the American Ideals; Thomas Jefferson (yes, that Founding Father) thought so highly of education he used his own money as a seed for the University of Virginia. The United States of America was the first country in the world to promote free education through 12th grade. Policies and discussions, sometimes of a very violent nature, have lead to the change and improvement of our system of education over the last 245 years. No one, of any rational thinking mind, can doubt the value of compulsory K-12 education, or the benefits it has bestowed upon our democracy in general.
The processes of education allow us to expand our minds, to open our thoughts to ideas outside the current local experience our childhood provides. Teachers, purveyors of wisdom and practice, have for generations waved away cobwebs of myth and illusion; instilling in students far and wide the need of, and appreciation for thought, study, and the practical application of knowledge. From the study of geometry and physics, we put a man on the moon; from literature and history, we learned of the great achievements and colossal failures of past generations. Without literature, history becomes statistics; as valuable as statistics are, they do not create passion in the hearts and minds of men.
It is consequently appalling to me when the desire of some citizens to ban "certain" books from libraries and reading lists becomes commonplace. I will be the first to agree that some subjects of common discourse today are uncomfortable for many; that is the first argument I think of for NOT banning books such as "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" and "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer." The vernacular, settings, and themes of books such as these are not of today, it is critical to remember these were the words and scenes of Samuel Clemens' time. A study of this historical literature provides ample opportunity to open discussion among students and parents regarding the realities of life in America at certain points in its past; as well as valuable discussion on our country's future potential.
In the Canyon School District in Utah, nine books are currently "under review" and have been removed from the libraries in the high schools until the review is complete; none are part of the required reading curriculum. The nine are: "The Bluest Eye" by Toni Morrison; "Gender Queer" by Maia Kobabe; "Beyond Magenta" by Susan Kuklin; "l8r,g8r" by Lauren Myracle; "Lawn Boy" by Jonathan Evison: "Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov; "Monday's Not Coming" by Tiffany Jackson; "The Opposite of Innocent" by Sonya Sones; and "Out of Darkness" by Ashley Hope Perez. (I admit, I have not read all of these books.) It's not hard to understand why the subject matter of these books makes some people uneasy; sex, race, sexual and racial orientation are not comfortable subjects for most adults. The availability of these books to high-school age students should be of unquestioned value: at worst, the books may encourage conversation between the parents and the teenagers; at best, the books may help students understand themselves, and others, better. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and slap down a common argument: reading a book about homosexual relationships will not make a person change their sexual identification.
Banning books does not change the historical or social value of a book or a philosophy; rather it displays the ignorance and fear of the banner. It is human nature to fear the unknown; to want to reach back into our comfort zone. Rather than fear these books, and the ideas they contain, perhaps a better use of our time would be to read them and reach into ourselves, to lift up our fear, hold it to daylight, and let the light of reality and reason displace fear.
Or, if you failed to learn from history, you could go to a meeting of like-minded people, light your torches and march to the library; when you get there, break down the door and burn the offending books on the street.
Let me know how that works out for you.
Thank you for reading, as always, your thoughts and comments are welcome.
R.M. "Bob" Hartman
The people who want to ban certain books and rail against CRT are the same folks who have no problem sending their kids to Sunday ''School'' to be indoctrinated int a cult that teaches an ''all loving'' god will cast you into a lake of fire for all eternity if you don't obey.
ReplyDeleteThe message of the Christian Bible represents the ultimate coercion, "Believe, or boil."
Delete